Just like all “Blogic” posts, the following does only form a loose and sort of accessory part of the endeavor – yet to be launched officially – that is loico, just a minute relay station within in the scientific community and not an original contribution. But when fundamental issues concerning humanity as a whole and its mental health are at stake, we, counting among our team a member with a professional history of successfully treating patients with psychiatric problems in different European hospitals, cannot remain silent.
After it has come to light1 that “Black Lives Matter” is a marxist – and blatantly racist – organization that could not care less about equal opportunity but that, according to rally signs exhibited by “activists”, simply wants to “kill” or “eat the rich”, now the “climate change” scare appears likewise to be crumbling to pieces.
Anyone convinced of speaking scientific truth will logically not attempt to silence others who see things differently but will trust in the power of his evidence and his conclusions drawn from it. Which is why I suspected for years that “climate change” alarmists were likely to be the anti-scientists in the decades-long shouting contest over causes and implications of actually detected global warming, as it had repeatedly come to light that alarmists had tried to silence non-conforming voices.
Now it appears we have a “climate change Edward Snowden”, a whistle-blower who destroys the entire “climate change” house of cards from the inside as far as political gain could be drawn from it.
The logic of his admission, given the economic, political and social consequences that “climate change” alarmism was to have – and has already had – for humanity, strongly points in the direction of a decidedly marxist mindset of the “climate change” alarmist mainstream as well. It may not be an accident that the “Club of Rome” traces its publicly visible roots back to the year 1968, and, given the decidedly anti-human nature of the marxist ideology, that the “Club of Rome” stated in its original manifesto that “the problem is humanity itself”.
But hey, we will, at some point, have an in-depth article on how marxism logically destroys itself. Today, we are just a relay station. Here is the apology I mentioned above, by none other than Michael Shellenberger. I strongly suggest you read it in case you haven’t yet.
What we find particularly interesting is Michael Shellenberger’s recent congressional testimony, on which Wikipedia has this to say:
In January 2020, Shellenberger testified before the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology of the U.S. House of Representatives. … Shellenberger … emphasized the importance of nuclear energy’s role in addressing climate change. When Rep. Jim Baird (R-IN) asked him about its potential, he replied “I believe that eventually we will be 100% nuclear. It may not be for another two hundred years, but it’s such a clearly superior energy technology, that’s eventually what it will be.”2_____