Notice: loico to exceptionally publish pre-launch articles in view of the Coronavirus crisis

At loico, we had planned to launch our oper­a­tion with a rel­a­tive­ly com­pre­hen­sive suite of arti­cles, often fair­ly ambi­tious, on which we are work­ing con­cur­rent­ly. Due to the esca­lat­ing Coronavirus cri­sis, we feel forced to aban­don this roadmap and to imme­di­ate­ly start con­tribut­ing what we can to the ame­lio­ra­tion of the sit­u­a­tion and its even­tu­al res­o­lu­tion. What will fol­low are there­fore iso­lat­ed arti­cles focused on con­nect­ing the dots already uncov­ered by oth­ers, the core busi­ness of the logician.

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on whatsapp
Share on pinterest
Share on vk
Share on linkedin
Share on xing
Share on google
Share on email
Share on print

“We are happy about [psychological] terrorism if it drives people to get vaccinated”

“The delta vari­ant is like a com­mon cold, but …”: Matteo Bassetti, noto infet­tivol­o­go tele­vi­si­vo: “La vari­ante Delta è come un sem­plice raf­fred­dore ma sono con­tento se si usa per fare ter­ror­is­mo per vac­cinare la gente!” Un medico che sposa la strate­gia del ter­rore deve essere denun­ci­a­to e radi­a­to dall’Albo dei medici. pic.twitter.com/YnPEvv0Mhe — RadioSavana (@RadioSavana) August 3, 2021 Why would one want to get vac­ci­nat­ed against the com­mon cold (which coro­n­avirus­es have caused prob­a­bly since humans exist)? A pro­fes­sor of med­i­cine who states such illog­i­cal­i­ty vio­lates his hip­po­crat­ic oath, and not only. He is respon­si­ble for phys­i­cal harm that vac­ci­na­tion caus­es

An implicit declaration of (civil) war

What is the essence of someone pretending not to notice the essential aspect of the central allegation with respect to an essential matter to which he is an interested party, implicitly saying A while stating B? A refusal to engage in rational dialogue, which in turn is the only way to ultimately avert violence: an implicit declaration of (civil) war.

Leave a comment / join the discussion

An implicit declaration of (civil) war

What is the essence of someone pretending not to notice the essential aspect of the central allegation with respect to an essential matter to which he is an interested party, implicitly saying A while stating B? A refusal to engage in rational dialogue, which in turn is the only way to ultimately avert violence: an implicit declaration of (civil) war.